Clean Air Act of 1990

The 1990 Clean air Act amendments reduced sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide by instituting a two phase cap and trade program. Phase I applied to the largest sources of emissions, and phase II applied to nearly all fossil fuel power plants. Additionally, this act required the complete phase-out of lead in fuels by 1995 and encouraged the use of low sulfur fuels. It mandated the use of Best Available Control Technologies (BACT) for major sources of pollution. These amendments authorized a program to control 189 toxic pollutants, including those previously regulated by the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. Finally, these amendments mandated the phase-out of certain ozone depleting CFCs, including some refrigerants.

Commentary

Darrel Issa’s Government Handover

Posted On: January 05, 2011

By Donald Cohen and Peter Dreier. Posted on Huffington Post. January 5, 2011.

Newly emboldened as chair of the House’s key investigative committee, California Cong. Darrell Issa, the conservative Republican, sent letters to more than 150 business lobby groups, asking them to identify government rules that they want eliminated.

Issa wants to hand the government over to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a who’s who of corporate America. The new Republican Congress is their opportunity to get rid of those pesky environmental laws, consumer product safety laws and even rules to prevent another Wall St. financial train wreck.

The Historical Record of Job Growth and Environmental Protection: A Convenient Truth for Climate Legislation

Posted On: June 18, 2009

Laurie Johnson. Posted on the Natural Resources Defense Council's Switchboard blog. June 18, 2009.

Over three decades of experience with environmental regulation show that investments in environmental protection, coupled with GDP growth, led to an increase in jobs that were orders of magnitude larger than any job losses caused by environmental requirements. The dire job loss predictions by industry simply never came to pass. Instead, tens of thousands of new jobs were created every year, much more than the job reductions per year that various government agencies and academic analyses found after the fact, in only a few sectors.[1] We detail the data further below.

Crying Wolf Again: Big Business Gearing up for a Fight Against Obama’s Environmental Program

Posted On: May 11, 2009

By Peter Dreier and Donald Cohen. Posted on Huffington Post. May 11, 2009.

In its first 100 days, the Obama administration did more to address global warming and the environmental crisis than the Bush administration did in eight years.

Obama knows, though, that the big environmental battles are still to come. In a interview last month, Lisa Jackson, Obama's EPA administrator, anticipated how opponents would attack the president's environmental reforms. "If you look at the history of environmental laws in this country, " she explained, "every time ... the lobbyists say, 'Oh, this will shut down the American economy. Every last one of you will lose jobs.' It's always these overblown, doomsday scenarios that overlook ... the fact that you can indeed build an economy towards green energy."

Cry Wolf Quotes

We just don't have the technology to comply [with Clean Air Act regulations]….[not even with] technology on the horizon.

Ford Motor Company, Testimony, House Committee on Energy and Commerce. May 1989.

05/01/1989 | Full Details | Law(s): Clean Air Act of 1990

[Further decreasing auto emissions] is not feasible or necessary and that congressional dictates to do so would be financially ruinous.

Anonymous auto industry executves. BLIND SPOT: THE BIG THREE’S ATTACK ON THE GLOBAL WARMING TREATY, The Environmental Working Group

03/26/1990 | Full Details | Law(s): Clean Air Act of 1990

This study leaves little doubt that a minimum of 200,000 (plus) jobs will be quickly lost, with plants closing in dozens of states. This number could easily exceed 1 million jobs-and even 2 million jobs--at the more extreme assumptions about residual risk.

The U.S. Business Roundtable, cited in NRDC Blog, 1990

01/01/1990 | Full Details | Law(s): Clean Air Act of 1990

The technology to meet these standards simply does not exist today…[and we predict] major supply disruptions.

Mobil, House Committee on Energy and Commerce. October, 1990.

10/01/1990 | Full Details | Law(s): Clean Air Act of 1990

Evidence

Blind Spot: The Big Three's Attack on the Global Warming Treaty
eleased during the controversy over the Kyoto Treaty, this study is a serious policy paper, exploring the intersections between transit policy and global warming. It fairly establishes the Big Three have as long history of stubborn obstructionism. (They don't like anyone telling them what to do.)
EPA: “Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act: Second Prospective Study—1990-2020”
Clean Air Act benefits total more than $2 trillion.
Industry Opposition to Government Regulation
The real costs of specific regulations, in chart form.
Jobs vs. The Environment: An Industry-Level Study
Four industries that operate under intense environmental regulatory scrutiny, but haven't lost jobs as a result.
Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act - 1990 to 2010
The monetizable benefits of the Clean Air Act are four times greater than the costs.

Backgrounders & Briefs

Good Rules: Ten Stories Of Successful Regulation

Demos looks at ten laws and rules that we take for granted.

Search form

Clean Air Act of 1990

Clean Air Act of 1990

Commentary

Darrel Issa’s Government Handover

The Historical Record of Job Growth and Environmental Protection: A Convenient Truth for Climate Legislation

Crying Wolf Again: Big Business Gearing up for a Fight Against Obama’s Environmental Program

Cry Wolf Quotes

Evidence

Backgrounders & Briefs

Good Rules: Ten Stories Of Successful Regulation